Banner reminding residents to use their prox cards to ease the burden of the guards before dual lane approval.
Speed hump in front of MBf Printing
Speed hump from LDP towards TMP
2 additional flood lights at T-junction next to IWK to brighten up the area at night
New Taman Mutiara Pucong road sign along service road in front of IWK
Above pictures illustrating all the positive development from the many request/proposal by RA TMP to MPSJ which were recently approved and acted upon with the end result of better lighting, signage and safety for all residents.
More improvements are expected and updates will be published accordingly for all to view. I for one cannot wait for the deliberation and execution of the construction of the second entry lane into TMP but realistically I do not expect this to be soon unless the developer takes immediate action to clarify matters with MPSJ pertaining the handover issue of the roads in TMP to them and at the same time exercise more corporate social responsibility to futher enhance the development in TMP especially for new house buyers in Phase 3B.
It will be a valauble image boost for the developer if they took it upon themselve to graciously finance the construction of the said 2nd entry lane into TMP, imagine the amount of goodwill that will bring. What is your feedback on this?
In the meantime kudos to the RA once again for making things happen and of course a very big thank you to MPSJ for acting so quickly into the request and proposal.
thanks to the community member...
ReplyDeletehowever feel like the lights along the road is not enuf yet. Mayb we should post up photos that we captured at night, see whether the light is enuf or not?
I agree the number of lighting points was still not enough. May be someone can help take night scene / video and pass to RA to elaborate the situation to MPSJ.
ReplyDeleteThe officer from MPSJ reiterated that the number of street light poles has to be limited due to the proximity to the high tension cables closely hanging above them. Hence no additional light poles were put up except 2 additional flood lights were added on to the existing pole at the T-junction. However the additinal lights are shining direct to vehicles at the T-junction, blinding the drivers. We may have to highlight this to MPSJ to rectify the problem.
SP